Threatens our health combined effect of many factors, which we are exposed to daily. Environmental pollution, pesticides, petroleum ucts, electric light of modern technology, products, content various additives, concentrates, artificial colors – all this leads to an increase in our need for feeder stances, anti-oxidant effect of which is necessary for the liberation of the body of this chemical pollution of our bodies. High levels of stress, as well as alcohol and drug abuse also increase the need for nutritional supplementation beyond the amounts currently recommended. As that as we age, we may not have enough hydrochloric acid or pancreatic enzymes to digest nutrients from food. Finally, the consumption of nutrients affecting multiple diseases, and their functions in body blocking a lot of medication. Thus, it is clear that we do not get and can not get optimal nutrition only from the food we eat. Nutritional supplements are needed, and this fact confirmed by many scientific studies. Virtually every study that compares similar groups of people taking and not taking supplements, shows that those who use supplements as generally much healthier.

Those members of the old guard, dieticians, who believe that we should get all the nutrients from food, take the dogma of faith, stubbornly ignoring the plethora of are published in the world of research demonstrating a successful clinical application of bio therapy after another. One would think, and why? Although the position of "nutrients should come from the food" formed by completely honest, if unscientific reasons, I do not think that it remains unchanged for so long in ignorance. It's not a secret intimate interdependence of the major giants of the food industry and management supply departments of many state institutions and structures. Some members of Congress believe that there is a conflict of interest when the person who receives money from the agro-industrial corporations, can define nutrition policies for the entire nation. To show how this happens, pay attention to the following fact: the profit margins in the food industry are highest when sold processed, packaged long-term storage food, and lowest in the sale of fresh produce, meat, fish, eggs and milk. The most profitable products – it's cereal, pasta, crackers and packaged bread. Can it be considered a coincidence that this list was proposed as the foundation of our food chain. If you were the head of one of the food corporations, would you not follow the business strategy, leading to greater consumption of highly profitable crops products, rather than generating a low profit of fresh foods.

During the last half century, the most effective strategy was to convince the ignorant people in power and the public that the grain the most useful products. But given the fact that according to research these highly allergenic refined products do more harm than good, such a belief requires some effort. No problems – everything you need to do is to fund a sufficient number of departments of power. The heads of these departments, in turn, will turn the scientific observations in the right direction, to prevent publication economically incorrect scientific articles in prestigious journals, which they control, to impose appropriate areas for further research and, most importantly, do not give to the government bosses no alternative ideas. It has long been a successful strategy was to say that scientific evidence is insufficient, and intentionally enter into an advisory board of "experts" who not only knows whose bread they eat, but also then, from what side he smeared with oil.