I would add a fourth leg to the table of Veliz and is social self-consciousness. (As opposed to Peter Thiel). It is recognizing us in our place and do not appear to be more rich as the poor or the middle class and do not appear to be more poor, as it is the case with the rich. Austerity is the way that the rich in Chile have to hide his fortune, but even though it is a virtue, only recognized as such when who practice makes it accordingly and not as a disguise social-recognized as such and occupy space within society with responsibility and establishment, is a fundamental condition for achieving development longed by all. The poor who hope that part of the well-being of the wealth reach them, not with handouts from the State or the upper class, but with stable, decent and recognized work. The rich man who refuses to assume its role as such, which is not recognized as an economic agent (the capital) is not fulfilling its task in this marathon towards development. Those who are hidden under the eaves of the austerity and do to hide their wealth, I would say a priest he is hiding from his own sins, Leon XIII is must-read for them, because it assigns them a paper rather than dominant in the actions of the wealth and social security. The poor have to protect them both as the rich, the former because they are in conditions of inequality to face society (lack education, opportunities, decent work, fair remuneration unfair inheritance of family breakdown), but opening their eyes about the mental attitude to poverty, which can be a warm bath that seduces you to live under such a State of condition, which shields States, gives you security, but not entrepreneurship. The mental attitude of human beings face the difficulties, sometimes is the largest show of our poverty. The same is true for the rich, the mental attitude to the hapless, the paradigm of the loose, does it stay inert to trigger changes that produce play its role of entrepreneur and social leader for the development-is in this game of honest us socially, where we see the leverage of social change, which will take us towards developing rapidly. Is not the State who should take care of the redistribution of income, through social protection or differentiated taxes, that is only an adjustment to cushion change, society is responsible for this action, we are all of us at our fair and real post within this society that we share.